my downstairs laura
30 September 2009 @ 10:26 pm
Chuck Grassley is losing his mind. I'm not even kidding. He reminds me of Reagan in the early stages.

He's always been a Republican but he was never a kook or a crank. He was like an "I'm a Republican because I'm boring" kind of senator. Now he's quoting bad research and arguing against things that aren't even in the bill he's arguing against and oh my god his Twitter feed. He reminds me of that Supreme Court justice on West Wing who started writing all his decisions as cinquain poems.
 
 
my downstairs laura
16 September 2009 @ 10:24 am
An excellent discussion of RaceFail in Transformative Works and Cultures, including many LJers: Pattern recognition: A dialogue on racism in fan communities

via [info]coffeeandink
 
 
my downstairs laura
14 September 2009 @ 12:18 pm
Once again, Naomi Wolf is like a decade late to the party.

And she's actually the one I agree with in this debate. Sorta. I guess.
 
 
 
my downstairs laura
21 June 2009 @ 10:44 am
Connor: We need a word for that -- when you don't want to post something because you think everyone's already heard about it. What's that feeling called?

Me: Also a word for the kind of comment that has no content or opinion, except "I already heard about that."

(Why do people do that?)
 
 
my downstairs laura
21 June 2009 @ 10:30 am
Chumbawamba has an EP ready to be mailed out on the day Margaret Thatcher dies.

It may happen next month, it may happen in five years, but by ordering now you can rest easy in the knowledge that you’ve put a down-payment on a small and perfectly-formed segment of the celebrations.
Tags:
 
 
my downstairs laura
10 May 2009 @ 09:32 pm
I meant to post this on May 1, but it works just as well on Mother's Day.

A while back my mom e-mailed me a link to the "history" section on her union's homepage and told me to scroll down to 1972:

1972
The ISEA wins a court ruling clarifying that pregnant teachers cannot be forced to resign, that they can use their accumulated sick leave for maternity purposes, and that they have the right to return to work following their maternity leave. After more than three years of litigation, that decision is upheld in the Iowa Supreme Court in 1975.


That was my mom. (I was the fetus.)

The school where she worked tried to fire her and four other teachers for being pregnant. She refused to resign and eventually the law was changed (or, I think more accurately, the existing law was enforced -- which was still precedent-setting).

Go Mom! Happy Mother's Day!
 
 
my downstairs laura
This is great:



The BBS I used to be on had a huge culture of this... lots of racist and homophobic terminology thrown around "ironically." Done well and done sparingly, okay, I get it. I mean, think of That Guy you know who is constantly, pedantically schooling everyone within earshot about how their language is not inclusive. (I think [info]gordonzola once did a satirical post pretending to be That Guy, asking if it was permissible to call someone a douchebag or was that an insult to women's feminine hygiene choices?) No one wants to be That Guy. He's usually dull-witted and there's a good chance he's hiding his discomfort with people unlike himself under his careful English language study. That's been my experience with That Guy, anyway.

But when this (quote) "hipster-ironic-Vice-magazine-thing" climate takes over to the point where ALL we hear from certain individuals are references to bitches, cunts, negroes, fags, and darkies -- where any attempt to contend with inequity in a serious fashion is considered boring and sooo 1990s -- wtf, world? I've read bloggers who apparently cannot even one time write the word "Arab" without spelling it "Ay-rab." I know who they think they're making fun of when they do that, but it implies that anti-Arab prejudice is the single most salient factor in Arabs' lives (rather than a part of the constellation of experiences that go into being human), and that anti-Arab prejudice only exists among the uneducated, rather than being frightfully common in, for example, Washington, where I assume the word is pronounced correctly.

Also? I'm not sure this is fair, but when someone does stuff like this they are announcing that they're really, really familiar with that kind of language and that type of thinking. I say that's possibly not fair because we're all familiar with it -- everyone's heard these slurs -- but when it's always the first thing that comes to mind? Really? Always? ...At that point I start to wonder who they're hanging out with.
 
 
 
my downstairs laura
26 April 2009 @ 04:13 pm
It's 85 degrees. On April 26.
Tags:
 
 
my downstairs laura
25 April 2009 @ 05:40 pm
 
 
my downstairs laura
16 April 2009 @ 08:42 am
Susan Boyle is not UGLY. She is AVERAGE. She looks like a regular person.

I'm not sure why anyone thought there was a correlation between "voice" and "appearance" anyway, but even putting that aside, this is an ordinary, middle-class, middle-aged woman who wore her Sunday best because she was going to be performing in public. Only in the world of television does that translate into FREAK SHOW.



If you saw this woman in the mall, would you run screaming in the other direction crying good god what is that hideous THING? No. If she were the secretary at your church, or waiting on you in Home Depot, would you recoil in horror? Obviously no. I think you would manage just fine.

It's her plain-Jane nothing-special story that makes her performance so uplifting: 47, unemployed, from a little town in Scotland, "never been kissed," Pebbles the cat... All that, plus the song she chose.

This is NOT a story of The Ugliest Woman In The World Has Talent. Good grief, get some perspective.
 
 
my downstairs laura
12 April 2009 @ 10:08 pm
FINALLY, someone questions the bible that is Strunk & White. 50 Years of Stupid Grammar Advice:

Following the platitudinous style recommendations of Elements would make your writing better if you knew how to follow them, but that is not true of the grammar stipulations.

"Use the active voice" is a typical section head. And the section in question opens with an attempt to discredit passive clauses that is either grammatically misguided or disingenuous.

We are told that the active clause "I will always remember my first trip to Boston" sounds much better than the corresponding passive "My first visit to Boston will always be remembered by me." It sure does. But that's because a passive is always a stylistic train wreck when the subject refers to something newer and less established in the discourse than the agent (the noun phrase that follows "by").

For me to report that I paid my bill by saying "The bill was paid by me," with no stress on "me," would sound inane. (I'm the utterer, and the utterer always counts as familiar and well established in the discourse.) But that is no argument against passives generally. "The bill was paid by an anonymous benefactor" sounds perfectly natural. Strunk and White are denigrating the passive by presenting an invented example of it deliberately designed to sound inept.


(I've been edited by many different people, some good, some bad, but being edited by someone who's on a crusade against the passive voice is always the worst. They pay no attention to emphasis or rhythm, or even basic clarity.)

There's more -- on "that" and "which," "however," and the adverb.

It's sad. Several generations of college students learned their grammar from the uninformed bossiness of Strunk and White, and the result is a nation of educated people who know they feel vaguely anxious and insecure whenever they write "however" or "than me" or "was" or "which," but can't tell you why. The land of the free in the grip of The Elements of Style.

So I won't be spending the month of April toasting 50 years of the overopinionated and underinformed little book that put so many people in this unhappy state of grammatical angst. I've spent too much of my scholarly life studying English grammar in a serious way. English syntax is a deep and interesting subject. It is much too important to be reduced to a bunch of trivial don't-do-this prescriptions by a pair of idiosyncratic bumblers who can't even tell when they've broken their own misbegotten rules.


link via [info]kynn
 
 
my downstairs laura
12 April 2009 @ 12:18 pm
This? Is awesome.
 
 
my downstairs laura
12 April 2009 @ 08:49 am
It's 34 degrees. On April 12.
Tags:
 
 
my downstairs laura
01 April 2009 @ 10:30 am
What to call your professor

Unfortunately they have no answers. :(

I usually call professors by their last names, without titles, but that doesn't work when you're talking TO them, and it also got stupid when I had a professor whose last name was "Honey."

Why don't they just SAY, in the first class, "I prefer to be addressed as Professor Lastname" or "You can call me Charlie!" or whatever? Is that too much to ask?

I always envied my friends who'd grown up in parts of the world where calling teachers "sir" and "ma'am" was normal. I'd be perfectly happy to do that, but coming from one American to another it would likely sound sarcastic.
 
 
my downstairs laura
26 March 2009 @ 08:33 am
I just got this e-mail from my daughter's principal:

Dear Faculty and Students:

It has come to my attention that rumors involving "vampires" began spreading through the building yesterday. In addition, police were in the building for routine business. These stories have caused significant disruption and anxiety for a number of students. At no time was anyone's safety in jeopardy.

I seek your cooperation in redirecting your energy toward the learning objectives of the day. Please do not sensationalize or discuss these rumors.

I am very concerned that the safety of certain students may be jeopardized as targets of rumors and speculation. Please alert any adult in the building if you feel that any student is being harassed or targeted.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Head Master


...But then, she WOULD say that, wouldn't she? I'm not fooled.

I wonder if K. is secretly a slayer.

ETA: Muah! This made the Boston Globe.
Tags:
 
 
Current Mood: suspicious
 
 
my downstairs laura
27 February 2009 @ 12:49 pm
1984  
Cyndi Lauper defends Madonna on the subject of sex and I am in sixth grade all over again.
Tags:
 
 
my downstairs laura
19 February 2009 @ 02:03 pm
Pa. judges accused of jailing kids for cash

In one of the most shocking cases of courtroom graft on record, two Pennsylvania judges have been charged with taking millions of dollars in kickbacks to send teenagers to two privately run youth detention centers...

Among the offenders were teenagers who were locked up for months for stealing loose change from cars, writing a prank note and possessing drug paraphernalia. Many had never been in trouble before. Some were imprisoned even after probation officers recommended against it.

Many appeared without lawyers, despite the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark 1967 ruling that children have a constitutional right to counsel...
 
 
my downstairs laura
13 February 2009 @ 11:44 am
What he said.

Also, have you seen Geert Wilders's film? It's just dumb. It's short and stupid. I'm not saying that (solely) because I'm too lazy to come up with a long, well-researched point-by-point refutation of it; I'm saying that because there's nothing more to be said about it.
 
 
my downstairs laura
20 January 2009 @ 10:37 pm
[info]unusualmusic points to this post from [info]cofax7, noting that the old robots.txt file at whitehouse.gov was 2400 lines long. That's all the stuff that couldn't be indexed or archived on the White House web site, making it harder to search for information. The new robots.txt file is 2 lines long, and allows everything.
Tags:
 
 
my downstairs laura
20 January 2009 @ 12:00 pm
11:59 A.M. DICK CHENEY IS UNEMPLOYED
 
 
my downstairs laura
19 January 2009 @ 05:14 pm
From [info]dcart: "I ask this favor of anyone reading this. For the rest of your life, if you hear any mention of anything positive that came out of the Bush presidency and/or Republican control of congress during much of it, you jump on that."

Read it all.
 
 
my downstairs laura
19 January 2009 @ 12:32 pm
Gaza demonstrations: Doth we protest too much? from altmuslim.com:

One young woman had a sign equating the Star of David with a swastika, followed by a question mark. I asked her about it, and she told me that she hoped to provoke thought. I did not press the issue with her, but I would ask her if the caricatures of the Messenger Muhammad ﷺ published in the Danish right-wing newspaper Jyllands-Posten “provoked thought.”

The desecration and abuse of these symbols is incompatible with the ethos of a humble believer. The Star of David, despite its appropriation by the state of Israel, remains a symbol of Judaism, which Muslims regard to be a revealed religion in its origin and a source of guidance. Regardless of whether the symbol has any real relationship to God’s Messenger David (Dawud in Arabic) ﷺ, anything tied with a messenger’s name should have some sanctity.
Tags:
 
 
my downstairs laura
17 January 2009 @ 08:17 pm
Tags: